2x2 Prioritization Matrix Template
Help your team base important decisions on weighted criteria with the 2x2 Prioritization Matrix Template.
About the 2x2 Prioritization Matrix
The 2x2 prioritization matrix, or lean prioritization approach, is a tool that helps teams decide what to tackle next in their product backlog.
The method is a quick, efficient way for your team to focus on features most likely to be valuable to your customers versus effort actually taken to deliver those features.
Any team applying lean start-up methodologies can also use this matrix to make decisions and figure out where to focus their efforts in relation to where the risk is, or where the most valuable opportunities are.
If you need a matrix that accommodates different phases or iterations, and granularity of effort versus value (from high to low), you may be looking for a 3x3 prioritization method.
What is a 2x2 prioritization matrix?
This model is a priority matrix that can help product managers determine priorities, and is also suitable for anyone leading projects and initiatives who needs help deciding what their team should focus on. A 2x2 prioritization matrix typically has 4 segments representing varying levels of effort and value:
Big bets, aka “do it next”: Product features or tasks that are valuable but difficult to implement.
Quick wins, or “do it now”: Product features or tasks that are valuable and easy to implement.
Time sinks, aka “don’t do it”: Product features or tasks that aren’t worth investing in right now.
Maybes or “do if or when there’s time”: Low-value tasks that can be returned to later on.
The value parameter considers the business value of your product feature or idea. The effort parameter considers resources (like time, money, people) that may be needed to finish the tasks outlined.
When to use the 2x2 prioritization matrix
Agile development teams can use the 2x2 prioritization matrix to decide which features, fixes, and upgrades to work on next. This framework can help you decide the least amount of features you need to launch a Minimum Viable Product (MVP), or prioritize tasks for an upcoming Agile sprint.
Whether you’re a product manager or leading a new business initiative, it’s worth considering how each idea informs each of these elements:
Acquisition (gaining new customers)
Activation (when customers understand the value of the product or feature)
Reach (how many customers are impacted)
Revenue (the profitability of a product or feature)
Retention (returning, active customers)
Virality (influence or “stickiness” of the product or service)
Teams can also use the matrix to make business decisions such as:
New markets worth pursuing and prioritizing
Campaigns and messaging to invest in
Departments, functions, or capabilities worth building or expanding on next
Ideally, a 2x2 prioritization matrix helps your team create boundaries around what is realistic to tackle, and develop clarity and consensus around what’s most important for success, versus nice-to-have or unnecessary.
Create your own 2x2 prioritization matrix
Making your own 2x2 prioritization matrix is easy. Miro’s virtual collaboration platform is the perfect canvas to create and share. Get started by selecting the 2x2 Prioritization Matrix Template, then take the following steps to make one of your own.
Step 1: Define your business value
Ideally, tie the value of a product feature or initiative to how your organization drives value. Discuss with your team whether you’re looking at strategic, customer, or financial value. Edit the value parameter text as needed.
Step 2: Define your risks
Risks usually come in the form of implementation (complexity, cost, or effort) and business-related (failure to adapt to change, compliance needs, or operational issues). Consider both. Discuss with your team which are more likely to impact plans. Edit the risks text as needed.
Step 3: Edit your priority categories as needed
You can also label the quadrants “Challenge,” “Implement,” “Reconsider,” and “Possible.” Brainstorm with your team about what action words best fit your product or initiative.
Step 4: Confirm and reach a consensus on priorities
The matrix brings reason and logic to a team dynamic. Everyone may have different opinions when first planning, but ideally, you want to end sessions with shared language: “low hanging fruit,” “hot zone,” “special investments,” “possible but low-value,” “more research before committing,” “only if extra budget and time are available,” and “not right now.” Think of these phrases as a spectrum between effort and value. Make decisions and investments accordingly.
Get started with this template right now.
PEST Analysis Template
Works best for:
Ideation, Strategic Planning, Business Management
No business operates inside a vacuum, so if you want to succeed, you have to successfully deal with local laws, government regulating bodies, the health of the local economy, social factors like the unemployment rate, average household income, and more. Use the PEST Analysis Template to help you explore how the world impacts your business and how you can work around it.
Meeting Template
Works best for:
Meetings, Team Meetings, Workshops
Everyone has been in a meeting that didn’t go as planned. Maybe it ran off course, or you ran out of time to accomplish everything you set out to do -- or maybe it just felt like a waste of time. To avoid that, it’s important to prepare to run a team meeting ahead of time. With this simple but effective template, you can prepare to run a team meeting that ticks all the boxes. By creating a streamlined way to build preparation into your workflow, you’ll ensure your meetings are efficient, enjoyable, and collaborative.
MoSCoW Matrix Template
Works best for:
Ideation, Operations, Prioritization
Keeping track of your priorities is a big challenge on big projects, especially when there are lots of deliverables. The MoSCoW method is designed to help you do it. This powerful technique is built on a matrix model divided into four segments: Must Have, Should Have, Could Have, and Won’t Have (which together give MoSCoW its name). Beyond helping you assess and track your priorities, this approach is also helpful for presenting business needs to an audience and collaborating on deliverables with a group of stakeholders.
HEART Framework Template
Works best for:
Desk Research, Project Management, User Experience
Happiness, Engagement, Adoption, Retention, and Task Success. Those are the pillars of user experience — which is why they serve as the key metrics in the HEART framework. Developed by the research team at Google, this framework gives larger companies an accurate way to measure user experience at scale, which you can then reference throughout the product development lifecycle. While the HEART framework uses five metrics, you might not need all five for every project — choose the ones that will be most useful for your company and project.
Work Breakdown Structure Template
Works best for:
Project Management, Mapping, Workflows
A work breakdown is a project management tool that lays out everything you must accomplish to complete a project. It organizes these tasks into multiple levels and displays each element graphically. Creating a work breakdown is a deliverable-based approach, meaning you’ll end up with a detailed project plan of the deliverables you must create to finish the job. Create a Work Breakdown Structure when you need to deconstruct your team's work into smaller, well-defined elements to make it more manageable.
Prune the Product Tree Template
Works best for:
Design, Desk Research, Product Management
Prune the Product Tree (also known as the product tree game or the product tree prioritization framework) is a visual tool that helps product managers organize and prioritize product feature requests. The tree represents a product roadmap and helps your team think about how to grow and shape your product or service by gamifying feedback-gathering from customers and stakeholders. A typical product tree has four symbolic features: the trunk, which represents the existing product features your team is building; the branches, each of which represents a product or system function; roots, which are technical requirements or infrastructure; and leaves, which are new ideas for product features.